[ad_1]
You usually hear individuals say that Bitcoin is a pseudonymous system, and that it is not nameless. What’s the precise distinction within the context of digital cash?
Pseudonymity means which you could see the fee historical past of a pseudonym (eg an tackle), however there isn’t any method (within the system itself) to hyperlink the pseudonym to an individual.
What would an nameless system appear to be? I’m conscious of Chaumian e-cash (https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/10666/69518), however what properties should nameless digital money have? Is it what Andrew Poelstra alludes to:
Whole anonymity, within the sense that while you spend cash there isn’t a hint of the place it got here from or the place it is going, is theoretically potential by utilizing the cryptographic strategy of zero-knowledge proofs.
So you possibly can see a fee, however you possibly can’t see the place the cash is coming from or the place it is going (identical to chaumian e-cash). Would something lower than this be thought of not nameless? I am not in search of options, solely what properties are wanted for an digital cash system to be nameless.
[ad_2]